ProxyMiner / Diff
Paycom Software, Inc. PAYC
Comparing the 2025 proxy against the 2026 proxy.
Compare
CEO total Δ
+561.2% year-over-year
Peer churn
Members added or dropped across all peer groups
Policy + metric churn
Disclosures whose value moved or appeared/disappeared
Peer groups
Peer disclosure
2025 Peer Group
— · 15 → 16 members
15 kept · +1 · −0
Added
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR)
Executive pay
Named executive compensation
| Executive | Status | From | To | Δ Total | Δ % | Δ At-risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chad RichisonChief Executive Officer | ChangedCEO | $3,454,117 2024 | $22,837,152 2025 | +$19,383,035 | +561.2% | +44.5 pp |
Chris G. ThomasFormer Co-Chief Executive Officer | RemovedCEO | $12,088,037 2024 | — | — | — | — |
Bradley S. SmithFormer Chief Information Officer | Changed | $2,670,938 2024 | $7,772,582 2025 | +$5,101,644 | +191.0% | -13.0 pp |
Craig E. BoelteFormer Chief Financial Officer | Changed | $4,239,406 2024 | $202,697 2025 | -$4,036,709 | -95.2% | -86.3 pp |
Randy PeckChief Operating Officer | Changed | $8,626,321 2024 | $5,188,496 2025 | -$3,437,825 | -39.9% | -5.7 pp |
Amy Vickroy WalkerFormer Chief Sales Officer | Changed | $2,692,894 2024 | $5,857,334 2025 | +$3,164,440 | +117.5% | +8.5 pp |
Holly FaurotFormer Chief Sales Officer | Removed | $3,708,247 2024 | — | — | — | — |
Jason D. ClarkChief Administrative Officer | Removed | $2,689,624 2024 | — | — | — | — |
Robert D. FosterChief Financial Officer | Added | — | $5,794,956 2025 | — | — | — |
Shane HadlockPresident and Chief Client Officer | Added | — | $2,616,191 2025 | — | — | — |
Governance
Policy guardrails
change in control
UnchangedNot extracted → Not extracted
“Change in Control Arrangements”
clawback
Unchangedpresent → present
“Clawback Policy”
compensation committee
UnchangedCompensation Committee → Compensation Committee
“For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, references to the “Committee” mean the Compensation Committee.”
compensation consultant
Unchangedindependent → independent
“independent compensation consultant and our CEO (except with respect to his own compensation).”
stock ownership guidelines
Unchangedpresent → present
“Stock Ownership Guidelines”
Performance markers
Metric facts
median employee compensation
Changed$81,644 → $103,900
Numeric delta: +22256.00
“ratio disclosures may involve a degree of imprecision, and the pay ratios reported by other companies are unlikely to be relevant or meaningful for purposes of comparison to our pay ratio disclosure. Using the methodolog…”
revenue
Changed$1.88 Billion → $1.94 billion
Numeric delta: +60000000.00
“AI product, IWant, and expanded data center capabilities, we are focused on realizing strong organic growth and operational efficiency. In 2025, Paycom delivered strong financial performance, exceeding initial expectatio…”
Narrative
CD&A prose similarity
Coarse measure of how much the compensation discussion text moved year-over-year. Not a substitute for reading the actual filings.
28% shingled-prose overlap between the two filings.
2025: 60,576 chars · 2026: 55,169 chars
- Committee Report:93% overlap (544 → 540 chars)
- Pay Ratio (Item 402(u)):41% overlap (2,705 → 2,391 chars)
- Say-on-Pay proposal:96% overlap (2,648 → 2,648 chars)
Narrative
What actually changed in the CD&A
Sentence-level diff between the two filings. New disclosures appear first, then sentences whose wording shifted, then sentences the prior year had that are no longer present.
- changedThis Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices and details the compensation paid to the following executive officers, collectively referred to as our NEOs: namedexecutiveofficers(“NEOs”):
- new2025 NEOs Title Chad Richison(1) Chief Executive Officer Shane Hadlock(2) President and Chief Client Officer Robert D.
- newFoster(3) Chief Financial Officer Randy Peck Chief Operating Officer Bradley S.
- newSmith(4) Former Chief Information Officer Craig E.
- newBoelte(5) Former Chief Financial Officer Amy Vickroy Walker(6) Former Chief Sales Officer
- new(1) During 2025, Mr. Richison served as Chief Executive Officer and President.
- newOn February 18, 2026, in connection with the promotion of Mr. Hadlock, Mr. Richison tendered his resignation from the position of President.
- new(2) Mr. Hadlock was appointed to serve as Chief Client Officer and Chief Technology Officer, effective August 18, 2025.
- newOn February 18, 2026, Mr. Hadlock was appointed to serve as President.
- newAs of the date of this proxy statement, his title is President and Chief Client Officer.
- new(3) Mr. Foster was appointed to serve as Chief Financial Officer, effective February 21, 2025.
- new(4) Mr. Smith resigned from his role as Chief Information Officer, effective October 31, 2025, and transitioned to the role of Senior Technical Strategist for the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Paycom Payroll, LLC (“Paycom Payroll”).
- changed(5) (1)Mr. Boelte retired from the Company effective February 21, 2025.
- new(6) Ms. Walker was promoted to serve as Chief Sales Officer, effective April 2, 2025.
- newMs. Walker transitioned to a non-employee consulting role in January 2026.
- changedOur solution requires virtually no customization and is based on a core system of record maintained in a single database for all HCM functions, including payroll, talent acquisition, talent management, managementandHR management and time and labor management applications.
- newWe are committed to delivering innovative solutions to our clients through our award-winning products and solutions, including IWant, our latest command-driven AI engine built on our single database, providing clients with employee data instantly and accurately, and Beti® and GONE, which significantly reduce payroll and PTO processing labor and errors for our clients.
- new35
- changed2025 2024Financial Performance Highlights
- newPaycom’s financial results for 2025 underscore the strength of our market differentiating and award-winning innovations and success of our full-solution automation strategy, which continues to deliver strong client ROI.
- newAs we prioritize AI developments, including our most recently launched command-driven AI product, IWant, and expanded data center capabilities, we are focused on realizing strong organic growth and operational efficiency.
- newIn 2025, Paycom delivered strong financial performance, exceeding initial expectations across key metrics.
- newTotal revenue reached $2.05 billion, with recurring and other revenue growing 10% year over year to $1.94 billion, surpassing our initial outlook of approximately 9% growth.
- newRevenue growth was broad-based across client sizes, with continued success in the upmarket segment, as revenue from clients with more than 1,000 employees grew faster than overall revenue.
- newOur 2025 performance was driven by strong operating leverage, automation, and disciplined cost management.
- newAdjusted EBITDA reached $882 million, representing a 43% adjusted EBITDA margin.
- newThese results reflect continued progress in scaling our platform efficiently while investing in innovation and service.
- newClient engagement and retention also strengthened during the year.
- newPaycom’s annual revenue retention rate increased to 91% in 2025, up from 90% in 2024, reflecting the value delivered through our automation initiatives and world-class client service.
- newWhile Paycom delivered solid financial performance in 2025, our stock price performance largely reflected broader market dynamics affecting the SaaS sector.
- newThroughout the year, SaaS and other high-growth technology companies experienced continued volatility driven by macroeconomic uncertainty and evolving investor sentiment regarding the perceived threat of emerging AI technologies on the software industry and broader market pressures affecting our clients.
- newIn 2025, Paycom made significant investments in AI and advanced data center infrastructure to support its full-solution automation strategy.
- changedWe remain committed to a pay-for-performance compensation program that is competitive to attract and retain best-in-industry talent, motivates executives to deliver stretch performance results and rewards individual contributions that drive our ability to deliver sustained stockholder value.
- newNormalized 2025 CEO compensation structure.
- newFollowing the full forfeiture of Mr. Richison’s 2020 CEO Performance Award in 2024, and with his annual compensation limited to base salary, payouts under the Annual Incentive Plan and perquisites in 2021 through 2024, the Committee undertook a comprehensive reassessment of the CEO compensation program.
- newIn consultation with its independent compensation consultant, the Committee approved a normalized 2025 CEO compensation framework designed to restore market alignment, address stockholder feedback and reinforce rigorous pay-for-performance principles, while appropriately incentivizing Mr. Richison’s continued leadership and contributions.
- new36
- newMr. Richison’s new compensation opportunities approved for 2025 were calibrated to align with relevant market benchmarks and designed to maintain a strong link between compensation outcomes, Company performance, and stockholder experience, with over 95% of total target compensation allocated to at-risk variable incentives.
- changedName 2025 Base Salary ($) Annual Incentive PSUs ($, at target) RSUs ($)StockAwards(1)($) Total Target Compensation ($) Target (%) Target ($) Chad Richison 865,280 100% 865,280 9,000,000 9,000,000 —19,730,560 RobertD.
- newMaintained a consistent compensation structure for other NEOs to support market competitiveness.
- newApproved in February 2025, target compensation opportunities for other continuing NEOs reflected the Company’s robust financial performance results achieved in 2024, while preserving a disciplined, performance-oriented incentive design.
- newConsistent with this approach, 50% of target equity compensation was delivered in the form of PSUs.
- newCompensation adjustments generally reflected expanded roles and increased scope of responsibilities.
- newThe Committee believes this structure appropriately balances performance accountability, executive retention, and competitive positioning within the executive talent market, while addressing stockholder feedback for a more consistent year-over-year compensation approach.
- newRevenue-based incentive design instills accountability in a volatile market environment.
- newThe Committee selected revenue as the core performance metric for both the annual cash incentive and equity incentive plans because it is the primary measure used by management and investors to assess the Company’s operating performance, growth trajectory and competitive positioning.
- newRevenue directly reflects execution against Paycom’s strategic priorities, including client acquisition, product adoption, retention, and expansion, and is the most meaningful driver of long-term stockholder value creation.
- newFor 2025, the Committee continued to maintain a one-year performance cycle for PSUs to preserve the rigor of the incentive plan in a volatile market environment.
- newIncentive plan payouts aligned with 2025 financial performance.
- newThe Committee determined that, on balance, incentive plan outcomes were appropriate and reflected strong operating execution and financial performance in a challenging environment.
- new› The annual incentive plan achieved a maximum payout based on 9% revenue growth compared to prior year.
- newThis outcome recognizes the leadership team’s direct influence on the Company’s most meaningful strategic progress during the year, including continued product innovation, expansion of the sales pipeline and strong client retention.
- new› Full-year revenue results supported a target-level payout for the 2025 PSUs, which did not provide for above-target payout opportunities.
- newAs of the vesting date, the value of shares delivered represented 61% of the initial target grant value on the vest day after considering the change in market value of our Common Stock since the grant date and accounting for the dividend equivalents associated with earned PSUs.
- changed2025 Say-On-Pay and Stockholder Engagement
- newPaycom maintains an annual advisory say-on-pay vote to provide our stockholders with the opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation program.
- newApproximately 91.4% of the stockholder votes present or represented at the 2025 annual meeting supported our say-on-pay proposal.
- newThe Committee considers the vote outcome an important input in future compensation decisions, as it reflects stockholder confidence in the Committee’s effectiveness in attracting, retaining and incentivizing key executive talent.
- newThe Board of Directors and the Committee prioritize regular and ongoing engagement with stockholders as a core component of effective governance oversight.
- newThese engagements provide meaningful insight into stockholder perspectives on our executive compensation program, governance practices, performance alignment and long-term strategic priorities.
- newIn 2025, independent members of the Board, with the support of management, continued their practice of proactively engaging with our largest stockholders to solicit feedback.
- newDuring our off-season stewardship-focused outreach, we contacted 12 of our top stockholders, representing approximately 49% of our outstanding shares held by non-affiliates and held meetings with eight stockholders who accepted our invitation, representing approximately 36% of our outstanding shares held by non-affiliates (based on ownership information as of June 30, 2025).
- newEach meeting was attended by at least one independent director, underscoring the Board’s commitment to direct engagement and accountability.
- newThroughout these discussions, stockholders expressed appreciation for enhancements made to our executive compensation program in response to prior engagement and feedback.
- newKey compensation-related themes raised in 2025 included:
- new› the Board and Committee’s priorities around executive retention;
- new› oversight of succession planning for the broader leadership team;
- new› preference for consistent year-over-year executive compensation approach; and
- new› compensation program design and alignment with strategic priorities.
- changedCompensation Component Objectives Base salary To compensate executive officers for services rendered during the fiscal year and to recognize their experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities Annual Incentive Plan To provide performance-based performance-based,short-termcash compensation to reward executive officers for the achievement of pre-established, near-term pre-establishedperformance objectives that support our ability to drive long-term value creation Equity incentives To support retention and reward executive officers for long-term corporate performance to align their interests with those of our stockholders Benefits and perquisites To maintain competitiveness of our executive compensation program and to attract and retain executives; executives participate in broad-based benefits programs that are generally available to all employees, employeesand any supplemental benefits or perquisites are considered on a case-by-case basis
- newCompany Performance and Outlook › Company performance in the prior year and year-over-year growth, based on both financial and non-financial metrics › Our outlook and operating plan for the upcoming year › Market compensation trends and competitive dynamics in the markets in which we compete for talent Executive Role and Performance › Each executive officer’s role, responsibilities, skills and internal pay equity › Individual performance assessments, including the CEO’s evaluation of each executive officer’s individual performance (see “—Role of Chief Executive Officer”) › Prior year compensation and relevant terms of any applicable employment agreements, if any › Executive retention considerations Compensation Structure and Equity Usage Considerations › Compensation analysis and benchmarking provided by the Committee’s compensation consultant › The size of equity pool available and relative allocation among executive officers and the other equity plan participants › Overall equity dilution, burn rates and equity overhang levels › The value, accounting expense and ongoing retentive impact of proposed and previously granted equity awards
- newThe Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our executive officers and, with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, recommends compensation actions for approval by the Board of Directors.
- changedIn fulfilling these responsibilities, Amongothermatters,the Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives related relevantto thecompensationofourexecutive compensation, officers,evaluates executive theperformance against oftheseofficersinlightofthose goals, goalsandobjectives,and approves all equity awards granted to ourexecutive officers.
- changedIn 2025, 2024,the Committee continued to engage Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its independent compensation consultant to provide input, analysis analysis,and advice about our compensation programs for executives and non-employee directors, including compensation philosophy and design, peer group data, competitive positioning and equity compensation practices.
- changedMeridian reports directly to the Committee and did not perform work for the Company Paycomin 2025 2024except as directed by the Committee.
- changedAfter reviewing and considering the factors set out by the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NYSE regarding the independence of compensation advisors, the Committee determined that Meridian is independent and its work in 2025 2024did not raise any conflicts of interest.
- changedIn 2025, 2024,Mr. Richison evaluated each executive officer other than himself, with input from other leaders within the Company.
- changedThis process led to a recommendation from Mr. Richison to the Committee with respect to the cash and equity compensation opportunities of each executive officer (other than himself). himself)aswellaswhetherequityincentiveawardsshouldbegranted.
- changedUltimately, our objective is to provide our executive officers with reasonable, competitive base salaries, time-based equity incentives to support retention retention,and the opportunity to earn additional compensation through performance-based incentives, which are designed to encourage achievement of pre-established performance target levels.
- changedBeginning in 2025, inordertobetteraligntheimplementationofsalarychangeswithotherannualexecutivecompensationdeterminations,the Committee transitioned intendsto reviewing, approving review,approveand implementing any implementannual executive officer salary changes changes,ifany,in the first quarter of each year to better align salary actions with the timing of other executive compensation determinations. year.
Removed from 2025
- 2024 NEOs Title Chad Richison Chief Executive Officer and President Craig E.
- Boelte(1) Chief Financial Officer Bradley S.
- Smith Chief Information Officer Randy Peck(2) Chief Operating Officer Amy Vickroy Walker(3) Executive Vice President of Sales Jason D.
- Clark Chief Administrative Officer Chris G.
- Thomas(4) Former Co-Chief Executive Officer Holly Faurot(5) Former Chief Sales Officer
- (2) Mr. Peck was promoted to serve as Chief Operating Officer effective May 30, 2024.
- (3) Ms. Walker was promoted to serve as Executive Vice President of Sales effective April 1, 2024.
- (4) Mr. Thomas resigned from the Company effective May 29, 2024.
- (5) Ms. Faurot transitioned to a non-employee role with the Company effective April 4, 2024.
- Paycom’s financial results for 2024 demonstrated strong momentum, driven by focused execution, organic sales growth and operational efficiency.
- 11% Organic Total Revenue Growth $1.88 Billion Total Revenue 26.7% Net Income Margin $502 Million Net Income 41.2% Adjusted EBITDA Margin* $775 Million Adjusted EBITDA* ~37,500 Clients as of Dec.
- 31, 2024 ~19,400 Clients (based on parent company grouping) >$229MM returned to stockholders through stock repurchases and dividends in 2024
- *Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures.
- See Appendix A for more information.
- Mr. Richison’s 2024 target compensation was again limited to base salary and annual cash bonus, consistent with prior years since 2021 and significantly below market benchmarks for comparable roles.
- Additionally, his 2020 CEO Performance Award (as defined below) was forfeited in full in 2024, with no portion of the award realized.
- Average 2024 total reported compensation for non-CEO NEOs decreased 70% compared to 2023 total reported compensation levels.
- Equity compensation for continuing non-CEO NEOs in 2024 reflected an equal split between performance- and service-based awards, whereas 2023 equity compensation reflected a one-time action the Committee deemed essential to promote continuity of our leadership team, increase the retentive value of outstanding awards amid a highly competitive talent market environment in the SaaS industry, foster alignment with our stockholders and focus executives on our strategic priorities during a period of several executive leadership team transitions.
- 2024 incentive plan payouts aligned with performance, reflecting robust annual revenue growth on a one-year basis and forfeiture of 2022 PSUs associated with three-year total stockholder return (“TSR”) performance, consistent with our stockholder experience.
- This marked the second consecutive year of full forfeiture of three-year PSUs.
- The Committee maintained a consistent compensation structure for 2025.
- In February 2025, the Committee approved 2025 target equity incentive opportunities for our current executive officers, which generally reflect an equal split of performance- and time-based equity awards.
- The table below sets forth the components of 2025 total target compensation for each current executive officer.
- Foster 566,800 100% 566,800 2,000,000 2,000,000 — 5,133,600 Bradley S.
- Smith 552,944 100% 552,944 2,000,000 2,000,000 — 5,105,888 Randy Peck 531,677 100% 531,677 1,750,000 1,750,000 — 4,563,354 Amy Vickroy Walker 537,680 100% 537,680 1,750,000 1,750,000 625,759 5,201,119 Jason D.
- Clark 621,920 100% 621,920 200,000 200,000 — 1,643,840
- (1) In February 2025, Ms. Walker was granted an award of 3,000 immediately vested shares of Common Stock.
- 2024 Stockholder Outreach
- In response to our 2024 say-on-pay proposal, which received majority support of votes cast, the Committee and the Board of Directors conducted an extensive outreach effort to understand our stockholders’ perspectives on our compensation and governance programs and to ensure appropriate responsiveness to stockholder feedback.
- Throughout 2024, we contacted 21 of our then largest stockholders, representing approximately 62% of shares of Common Stock held by institutional investors.
- In total we held 12 stewardship-focused meetings with nine of our largest stockholders, representing approximately 46% of shares of Common Stock held by institutions, with at least two independent directors participating in each of these discussions.
- CONTACTED 21 STOCKHOLDERS representing 62% of outstanding shares held by institutional investors as of 6/30/2024 ENGAGED WITH 9 STOCKHOLDERS representing 46% of outstanding shares held by institutional investors as of 6/30/2024 100% of engagement meetings attended by at least two independent Board members
- Paycom Engagement Team
- Lead Independent Director Frederick C.
- Peters II Compensation Committee Chairperson J.C.
- Watts, Jr. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson Sharen J.
- Turney Audit Committee Chairperson Felicia Williams Management Representatives Members of our legal, investor relations and sustainability teams
- Our stockholders had diverse views on our executive compensation program, with common themes of feedback summarized below.
- Overall, stockholders appreciated the Committee’s focus on the executive leadership team’s retention during a period of several executive transitions, expressing support for the Committee’s efforts to strengthen the executive compensation program design by increasing the percentage of the total compensation allocated to performance-based equity incentives.
- Stockholders reiterated their preference for a consistent and balanced approach to executive compensation that included a mix of performance-based and service-based equity awards, which we incorporated into our 2024 and 2025 compensation programs.
- Our stockholders also responded favorably to the forfeiture of the 2020 CEO Performance Award, which they viewed to be responsive to their feedback and encouraged the Committee to use as an opportunity to reset Mr. Richison’s compensation program to encourage and incentivize his continued contributions to our growth strategy.
- The majority of those stockholders with whom we spoke and who voted against our 2024 say-on-pay proposal expressed that they did so due to concerns over certain one-time changes to our equity incentive program in 2023, including increased value of incentive opportunities for our NEOs and a greater allocation of equity incentives to time-based awards, which the Committee believes it has appropriately addressed through updates to our 2024 compensation program.
- The Committee remains committed to ongoing dialogue with our stockholders as we continue to evolve our compensation program, with stockholder feedback remaining a critical input into the Committee’s decision-making process.
- Key Feedback Themes Committee Responsiveness Actions Concern over magnitude of NEO compensation › For the 2024 program, target equity grant values for the non-CEO NEOs were significantly reduced.
- On average, reported compensation for our non-CEO NEOs decreased by over 70% from the 2023 reported compensation levels.
- › Mr. Richison’s 2024 target compensation continued to be limited to base salary and annual cash bonus, which was the case every year since 2021.
- Preference for a consistent ratio of performance-based equity incentives › The Committee approved 2024 target equity incentive opportunities for the continuing non-CEO NEOs with an equal split between performance- and service-based equity awards, instead of the majority of equity incentives delivered in the form of service-based awards, as was the case in 2023.
- › The same equally weighted allocation between performance- and service-based incentives was maintained for the 2025 long-term incentive program.
- Focus on CEO’s go-forward compensation following forfeiture of the 2020 CEO Performance Award › In early 2025, the Committee reassessed our compensation program for Mr. Richison, taking into account, among other factors, the forfeiture of the 2020 CEO Performance Award in 2024 and the subsequent resignation of Mr. Thomas.
- › Based on the CEO compensation benchmarks for industry peers in the HCM and SaaS sectors, the Committee approved the following CEO target compensation for 2025: › $865,280 base salary › 100% of base salary annual bonus target opportunity › $9,000,000 target grant value of PSUs › $9,000,000 grant value of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) › The Committee believes Mr. Richison’s go-forward target opportunity is reasonable, market-aligned and reflects preferences of our stockholders with nearly 96% of target incentive opportunities at-risk, with realizable value tied to the achievement of pre-set, rigorous performance goals.
- Preference for multi-year performance periods for equity incentives › In light of economic uncertainty, the Committee aims to incentivize the executive team based on factors within their control.
- The Committee believes that shorter-term targets are necessary to maintain the rigor of the equity incentive program, ensuring robust performance levels on an annual basis without strong performance in one year offsetting underperformance in another during a multi-year performance period.
- › The Committee will continue to review market conditions and evaluate whether longer performance periods for future equity awards would be appropriate.
- Preference for diversified metrics across cash and equity incentive plans › Annually, the Committee considers the use of different metrics in our executive compensation plans.
- The Committee chose to use revenue as a key performance metric in both our cash and equity incentive plans because revenue growth is a critical measure of our operational success.
- Revenue growth is also a key metric used by our investors to assess our annual and longer-term performance.
- This focus reflects our strategic priority to maintain a strong revenue growth rate, which underpins our broader growth strategy and supports the creation of sustainable value for stockholders.
- › The Committee will continue to assess appropriateness of incorporating additional metrics in the annual and long-term incentive plans in alignment with the strategic priorities of our growth strategy.
- › the Company’s performance in the previous year and year-over-year growth, based on both financial and non-financial metrics;
- › our outlook and operating plan for the upcoming year;
- › retention considerations;
- › compensation analysis provided by the Committee’s compensation consultant;
- › each executive officer’s role, responsibilities, skills and internal pay equity;
- › each executive officer’s compensation for the previous year and relevant terms of the executive officer’s employment agreement, if any;
- › evaluation of each executive officer’s individual performance (see “—Role of Chief Executive Officer”);
- › aggregate equity pool available for awards for the year and the relative allocation of such pool among the executive officers and the other participants;
- › overall equity dilution and burn rates as well as equity overhang levels;
- › value of, and expense associated with, proposed and previously awarded equity grants, including the continuing retentive value of past awards; and
- › compensation trends and competitive factors in the market for talent in which we compete.
- The Committee reviews and approves, or recommends that our Board of Directors approve, the compensation of our executive officers.
- In October 2023, the Committee reviewed comparative executive compensation data from a group of companies identified based on the selection criteria described below.
- In developing the primary peer group, the Committee sought to include U.S.-headquartered companies that, in the Committee’s view, are similar to the Company in terms of size, industry focus and level of operational and organizational complexity.
- Potential peer group companies were evaluated based on the trailing 12 months of data that preceded the annual peer group review.
- With the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, the Committee ultimately identified the primary peer group set forth below.
- The primary peer group includes 19 software companies with median revenues of $1.8 billion and median market capitalization of $15.0 billion.
- For the 2024 peer group, Coupa Software and Zendesk were removed from the group due to their respective acquisitions, and PTC and Dynatrace were added as software companies of similar size and complexity to our operations to maintain a balanced peer group composition.
- Name Prior BaseSalary ($) 2024 Base Salary ($)(1) % Change Chad Richison 800,000 832,000 4% Craig E.
- Boelte 524,097 545,061 4% Bradley S.
- Smith 511,228 531,667 4% Randy Peck(2) — 511,228 — Amy Vickroy Walker(3) — 517,000 — Jason D.
- Clark 575,000 598,000 4% Chris G.
More changes truncated for legibility. Open the filings on SEC for full prose.
Cells reading “Not extracted” mean the deterministic extractor didn’t pick up that disclosure for the listed filing — not that it isn’t in the proxy. Open the company workspace and use Ask to query the CD&A directly.