ProxyMiner / Diff

KFORCE INC KFRC

Comparing the 2025 proxy against the 2026 proxy.

← Back to KFORCE INC

Compare

CEO total Δ

+$1,209,997

+28.8% year-over-year

Peer churn

+12 −8

Members added or dropped across all peer groups

Policy + metric churn

3

Disclosures whose value moved or appeared/disappeared

Peer groups

Peer disclosure

  • Compensation Peer Group

    compensation · 0 → 12 members

    0 kept · +12 · −0

    Added

    ASGN Incorporated · Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) · RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP) · BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES INC (BBSI) · ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) · ROBERT HALF INC. (RHI) · CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) · KELLY SERVICES INC (KELYA) · TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) · HACKETT GROUP, INC. (HCKT) · Heidrick & Struggles International Inc. · ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)

  • 2024 Peer Group

    — · 8 → 0 members

    0 kept · +0 · −8

    Removed

    BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES INC (BBSI) · ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) · RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP) · CBIZ, Inc. (CBZ) · KELLY SERVICES INC (KELYA) · ROBERT HALF INC. (RHI) · HACKETT GROUP, INC. (HCKT) · ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)

Executive pay

Named executive compensation

ExecutiveStatusFromToΔ TotalΔ %Δ At-risk
Joseph J. LiberatoreChief Executive Officer
ChangedCEO$4,205,824

2024

$5,415,821

2025

+$1,209,997+28.8%+4.9 pp
David M. KellyChief Operating Officer
Changed$2,023,237

2024

$2,799,463

2025

+$776,226+38.4%+4.5 pp
Jeffrey B. HackmanChief Financial Officer
Changed$1,391,593

2024

$2,114,163

2025

+$722,570+51.9%+5.7 pp
Andrew G. ThomasChief Experience Officer
Changed$1,212,792

2024

$1,506,504

2025

+$293,712+24.2%+5.1 pp

Governance

Policy guardrails

  • change in control

    Unchanged

    Not extracted → Not extracted

    “The specific amounts the NEOs would receive under the employment agreements are described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this Proxy Statement below”

  • clawback

    Unchanged

    present → present

    “Clawback Policy is included as an exhibit to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.”

  • compensation committee

    Unchanged

    Compensation Committee → Compensation Committee

    “Role of the Compensation Committee The Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, oversees the development and application of the compensation principles that guide the design of the Firm’s NEO compensation p…”

  • compensation consultant

    Unchanged

    independent → independent

    “Independent Compensation Consultant”

  • hedging

    Unchanged

    prohibited → prohibited

    “No Hedging or Pledging (including Margin Accounts)Our Insider Trading Policy expressly prohibits engaging in any hedging transaction related to the Firm’s securities (including, without limitation, prepaid variable forwa…”

  • pledging

    Unchanged

    prohibited → prohibited

    “No Hedging or Pledging (including Margin Accounts)Our Insider Trading Policy expressly prohibits engaging in any hedging transaction related to the Firm’s securities (including, without limitation, prepaid variable forwa…”

  • stock ownership guidelines

    Unchanged

    present → present

    “The Firm’s compensation program has the following features for alignment with best practices:Minimum Required Share Ownership GuidelinesOur Corporate Governance Guidelines include a stock ownership policy for our directo…”

Performance markers

Metric facts

  • ceo pay ratio

    Changed

    61 to 1 → 80 to 1

    Numeric delta: +19.00

    “for 2025, as reflected in the SCT included in this Proxy Statement. Our median employee had total annual compensation of $67,590 for 2025, which was calculated on the same basis as Mr. Liberatore’s compensation for the p…”

  • median employee compensation

    Changed

    $68,722 → $67,590

    Numeric delta: -1132.00

    “As such, our employee population includes a significant number of individuals that do not reflect a full year of compensation due to the short-term nature of their assignments. Mr. Liberatore had $5,415,821 in total annu…”

  • revenue

    Changed

    $1.41 billion → $1.33 billion

    Numeric delta: -80000000.00

    “in the operating environment heading into 2026. We believe clients have maintained a meaningful backlog of strategically essential technology initiatives that they expect to advance once confidence in the macroeconomic o…”

  • say on pay

    Unchanged

    Not extracted → Not extracted

    “say on pay proposal has received substantial support from our shareholders.”

Narrative

CD&A prose similarity

Coarse measure of how much the compensation discussion text moved year-over-year. Not a substitute for reading the actual filings.

27% shingled-prose overlap between the two filings.

2025: 47,542 chars · 2026: 53,349 chars

  • Pay Ratio (Item 402(u)):59% overlap (2,143 → 2,143 chars)
  • Say-on-Pay proposal:72% overlap (24,999 → 25,000 chars)

Narrative

What actually changed in the CD&A

Sentence-level diff between the two filings. New disclosures appear first, then sentences whose wording shifted, then sentences the prior year had that are no longer present.

141 new84 changed103 removed107 unchanged
  • changedCompensation Committee ReportThe Compensation Committee of Kforce (the Committee) has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into Kforce Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.Submitted 2024.Submittedby the Compensation Committee on March 6, 2026 7,2025Randall A.
  • changedThe above report shall not be deemed soliciting material or filed with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filings. filings
  • new22 Kforce 2026 Proxy Statement
  • changedThis CD&A primarily focuses on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) for the year ended December 31, 2025. 2024.
  • newManagement and the Board reaffirmed the Firm’s strategic priorities, including (i) the implementation of Workday as our future state enterprise cloud application for HCM and financials, (ii) our integrated strategy efforts, (iii) the evolution of our offshore delivery capability in Pune, India, and (iv) advancing our Firm’s strategies through leverage of AI.
  • newThe objectives for the NEOs in 2025 were not limited to but were centered around the Firm’s strategic priorities given their depth and expected contribution to attaining our future financial objectives and, as a result, generating significant shareholder value.
  • newIn light of the ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties, management continued to advance the Firm’s transformational strategic priorities in 2025, achieving measurable progress across several enterprise initiatives that remain central to our long‑term value‑creation objectives.
  • newWe believe these efforts reflect disciplined execution in a year marked by persistent macroeconomic uncertainty and ongoing softness in the broader technology services market.
  • changedFor the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024,the Firm:
  • new•Experienced a year-over-year decline in revenue of 5.4% (5.1% per billing day) and adjusted diluted EPS of 22.0% while exercising disciplined cost management to mitigate the pressure on the bottom line from the lower revenues.
  • new•Delivered top-tier Technology organic revenue performance compared to our most comparable publicly-traded peers.
  • new•Our organic growth strategy has continued to put us in a solid position to return significant capital to our shareholders.
  • newIn 2025, we returned $76 million in capital in the form of open market repurchases totaling $48.5 million and dividends of $27.5 million.
  • changedEach of our threestrategic priorities represents a multi-year aretransformational effort innatureand our people made tremendous progress in 2025, 2024,as we:
  • new•Achieved substantial advancements on the implementation of Workday through disciplined execution across key program milestones.
  • newDuring 2025, management completed initial testing for both human capital management and financial modules within our initial prototype tenant containing the full suite of Workday functionality.
  • newThe team also enhanced data migration and resource plans to ensure continued data fidelity, and revised the program timeline to incorporate refinements stemming from the updated data migration approach.
  • newWe remain on track for an early 2027 implementation date.
  • new•We made significant progress further integrating our consulting solutions offering throughout the Firm.
  • newOur integrated strategy efforts are centered around enhancing enterprise execution and ensuring a more cohesive go‑to‑market approach across sales, recruiting, consulting solutions and technology practice teams with the goal of accelerating future revenue growth and profitability enhancements.
  • newDuring 2025, we made several changes that better optimized the compensation practices across the Firm, unified our margin expectations across our Technology business, laid the foundation for enhanced productivity expectations, among several other items.
  • newOur consulting solutions offering contributed positively in 2025 to our financial results.
  • new•Completed the foundational build‑out of our delivery capability in Pune, India in 2025 referred to as Knowledgeforce India.
  • newOur India operation enhances the Firm’s ability to serve clients through a multi-shore delivery model and expands access to highly skilled technical talent.
  • newWe began supporting our U.S. client engagements in January 2025, marking a significant milestone in the evolution of the Firm’s delivery strategy.
  • new•Formalized the Firm’s artificial intelligence strategy and related efforts by establishing a structured adoption roadmap to accelerate productivity gains and build baseline AI proficiency across the organization as well as define the necessary investments within the Firm to best position Kforce to capture AI-related future demand .
  • newIn addition to the significant advancements made with respect to our strategic priorities, there were many other notable advancements and accolades.
  • new•During 2025, Kforce received several notable third‑party recognitions that reinforce the strength of our culture, our people‑first philosophy, and the effectiveness of our leadership.
  • newThese awards include, but are not limited to: Best Workplace in Consulting and Professional Services, America's Best Recruiting Firms, Top Workplace in Tampa Bay and Great Place to Work.
  • new23 Kforce 2026 Proxy Statement
  • new•Our business, among many others, has historically been susceptible to candidate embellishments.
  • newThis has escalated over the last few years to be more organized, technology-enabled and systemic fraudulent misrepresentations, which created a heightened reputational risk for Kforce (and others in our space).
  • newWe responded quickly to significantly bolster existing processes and procedures to address this, including additional identity validation steps and the implementation of AI-enabled technologies to assist in our efforts.
  • new•No incentive payout for the Revenue component due to below threshold performance partly due to the rigor in the financial performance metrics, and below target EPS annual incentive payout.
  • changed•Near maximum attainment of individual performance objectives (MBOs) for each NEO due to the tremendous progress in our multi-year strategic initiatives, as noted in this section above.
  • new•Equity Long Term Incentive (LTI) payouts slightly below target payout levels based on Kforce’s TSR being slightly below the average TSR performance of the Performance Peer Group.
  • changedOverall, the Committee believes the compensation levels for 2025 2024,whichweresignificantlybelowtargetlevels,are reasonably aligned with the Firm’s performance and accomplishments. results.
  • changedWhat We DoWhat We Don’t DoTarget Annual NEO Compensation at Market Median for Market Median PerformanceDefine Market Median by Comparison to Companies Outside of our Primary SectorAlign Pay with Performance by Paying Higher Compensation for Above Median Performance and Lower Compensation for Below Median PerformanceSet Targets for Incentive Plans that are Easy to AttainEnsure Performance-Based Compensation is the Largest Part of Total CompensationProvide Excessive PerquisitesMaintain PerquisitesMaintainsa Clawback PolicyAllow Repricing or Cash Buyouts of Previous Equity-Based LTI GrantsEnsure Equity-Based LTI Compensation is a Significant Component of Performance-Based CompensationAllow Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock or Other Related ActivitiesRequire Minimum Levels of Share Ownership (for our Board and our executives)Create OwnershipCreateNew Excise Tax Gross-upsAdhere to Minimum Levels of Financial Performance that Must be Attained to Achieve Threshold Payout Levels Even in Adverse Economic EnvironmentsCreate New or Materially Amend Executive Employment Agreements with Provisions for Severance Payouts Exceeding 1x Cash Compensation or Change in Control Severance Payouts Exceeding 2x Cash CompensationBenchmark Compensation Against Other Similarly Sized (Considering Median CompensationStructuretheRevenue and Market Capitalization Levels) Companies in our Sector ComponentoftheAnnualIncentivetoOnlyPayWhenRevenueGrowthisAchievedPayBonusesfortheRevenueComponentoftheAnnualIncentiveWhenRevenuesDecline
  • new24 Kforce 2026 Proxy Statement
  • changedOur executive compensation philosophy is to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executives who can advance the Firm’s maximizelong-term shareholder value.
  • changedTo support carryoutthis philosophy, the Committee, wehaveembracedthe Board and management apply clearly defined followingprinciples that intendedtoguide both the structure of our compensation programs designand oversight.Attract administrativedecisionsmadebytheCommittee,theBoardandmanagement.Attractand Retain Key ExecutivesAttracting and retaining key executive talent is critical to the success of a professional staffing and solutions firm in which people represent the true assets.
  • changedThe Committee believes an understanding of competitive market pay levels and compensation best practices are isessential to hiring and retaining qualified executives who are able to create and drive business strategies, long-term profitable growth and long-term shareholder value.
  • changedPerformance-based compensation comprised 83% 82%of total target direct compensation for our CEO and between 72% 73%and 77% 78%for our other NEOs in 2025. 2024.
  • changedEnsure Equity-Based LTI Compensation is a Significant Component of Performance-Based CompensationThe Committee believes equity-based LTI compensation should be a significant component of performance-based compensation to further align our NEOs’ NEO’sinterests with our shareholders in generating long-term shareholder returns.
  • changedEquity LTI LTIsranged from 65% 66%to 74% 73%of target total performance-based compensation for our NEOs in 2025. 2024.
  • changedWe believe the opportunity to earn the designated equity LTI performance objectives motivates the achievement of higher relative TSR and drives continued improved shareholder value; it also serves to retain our executives for the long term, long-term,given that our LTI awards have time-based vesting provisions of generally four years.
  • changedTo further align the interests of our executives and Board of Directors with those (andmembersof our BoardofDirectors)andlong-term shareholders, the ourBoard has adopted formal share ownership guidelines.
  • newSet Challenging Performance ObjectivesThe Committee seeks to establish rigorous yet attainable financial performance objectives for the NEOs under the annual incentive plan.
  • newThese goals are intentionally calibrated to be demanding, as demonstrated by the fact that threshold and target levels have not been attained in every plan year, including 2023, 2024 and 2025.
  • newThe performance objectives are structured to incentivize the NEOs to outpace market expectations, drive market share expansion, and strengthen profitability.
  • new25 Kforce 2026 Proxy Statement
  • changedThe minimum level of holdings for each position is as follows:Target Holding LevelPositionAnnual Board FeesinCash Retainer / SalaryMember of the Board of Directors5x (recently increased from 4x)Chief Directors4xChiefExecutive Officer5xChief Operating Officer3xOther Named Executive Officers2xOther members of Kforce’s Executive Leadership Team1xIn accordance with this policy, directors have five years from the effective date of joining the Board, and executives have five years from the effective date of a promotion or salary increase, to attain the target ownership level.
  • newOur Clawback Policy is included as an exhibit to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  • newIn addition, our Stock Incentive Plans since 2019 require a minimum holding period of one year after exercise of any options and stock appreciation rights for all NEOs; we will also apply this policy to any awards granted outside of this plan.
  • newWe do not currently grant stock options as a part of our equity compensation program to executive officers.
  • newIf stock options were to be granted in the future, the Firm would not grant such options in anticipation of the release of nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock and would not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
  • changedDuring 2025, Inaddition,ourStockIncentivePlanssince2019requireaminimumholdingperiodofoneyearafterexerciseofanyoptionsandstockappreciationrightsforallNEOs;wewillalsoapplythispolicytoanyawardsgrantedoutsideofthisplan.During2024,(i) none of our NEOs were awarded stock options with an effective grant date during any period beginning four business days before the filing or furnishing of a Form 10-Q, Form 10-K or Form 8-K that disclosed material nonpublic information, ending one business day after the filing or furnishing of such reports, and (ii) we did not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
  • changedInsider TradingOur Insider Trading Policy governs the purchase, sale sale,and other dispositions of our securities undertaken by the Firm’s, or its subsidiaries: (i) directors, officers, employees, consultants and contractors; (ii) any member of the immediate family or household of any such person, including family members who do not reside in the household but whose investment decisions are directed by, or otherwise conferred with, such person when making investment decisions with respect to Firm securities; and (iii) any entities controlled by such person (a Firm Insider).
  • changedWe believe our policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and the NYSE listing standards.Our Insider Trading Policy is included wasfiledas an exhibit to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K fortheyearendedDecember31,2024and reflects the SEC’s final rules pertaining to 10b5-1 trading plans and related disclosures.
  • changed26 Kforce 2026 2025Proxy Statement
  • changedThere were no executive officers or directors that held the Firm’s securities in a margin account or otherwise pledged the Firm’s securities as collateral during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. 2024.
  • changedElimination of Excise Tax Gross-UpIn 2009, the Committee resolved to not enter into any new employment agreements, or materially amend any existing employment agreements with its executives executives,that contain excise tax gross-up provisions in the event of a change-in-control event going forward.
  • changedThe Committee, composed whichconsistsentirely of independent directors, oversees isresponsibleforthe development and application of the compensation principles that guide the design of the Firm’s NEO executivecompensation program, including related inclusiveofbenefit policies and practices.
  • changedThe Committee has determined concludedthat the Firm’s compensation policies and practices oftheFirmdo not create risks thatarereasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Kforce.
  • newIn carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee maintains strict independence and objectivity and meets in executive session on a quarterly basis to discuss and determine matters related to executive compensation.
  • newWhile the Committee considers input from the CEO, COO and CFO, all decisions regarding the compensation of the CEO and the other executives are made solely at the Committee’s discretion.
  • newThe Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees when appropriate.
  • changed•ensuring that Kforce’s executive compensation program reflects remainsalignedwithbest practices and serves isinthe long‑term bestinterests of ourshareholders;
  • new•engaging, as appropriate and in coordination with management, with shareholders to understand their perspectives and feedback; and
  • changed•remaining •stayinginformed on ofcurrent and emerging compensation trends and best practices, including through ongoing engagement with its theCommittee’sindependent compensation consultant.
  • changedDuring 2025, 2024,the Committee hasretained Pay Governance LLC, a national independent consulting firm, firm(Pay Governance) Governance),to serve as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
  • newThe Committee conducted an independence assessment, considering all relevant factors, and concluded that Pay Governance’s engagement and services did not present any conflicts of interest.
  • changedOther than the work performed Exceptfor theservicesprovidedtothe Committee, Pay Governance did not provide any additional otherservices to the Firm.
  • newPay Governance supports the Committee by providing objective analysis and guidance on a range of matters, including the alignment of our executive compensation framework with approved objectives, assessments of program effectiveness, benchmarking and market competitiveness studies, and evaluations of our compensation levels and structures, including base salary, annual incentives, and long‑term incentive opportunities, as directed by the Committee.
  • newThrough this engagement, the Committee ensures that Kforce’s executive compensation program remains competitive, performance‑aligned, and consistent with best practices.
  • newFor the year ended December 31, 2025, the Committee used two peer groups to evaluate and structure executive compensation: the Performance Peer Group and the Compensation Peer Group.
  • newThe Compensation Peer Group reflects a broader set of companies that are more closely aligned with Kforce in terms of size (revenue and market capitalization), although they may operate outside our primary industry or provide different services.
  • newThe Committee believes that using multiple peer groups provides a more comprehensive and appropriate framework for benchmarking and supports a robust, well‑aligned compensation program.
  • changedThe Committee reviews the composition of both thepeer groups groupon an annual basis with the assistance of Pay Governance.
  • changed27 Kforce 2026 2025Proxy Statement

Removed from 2025

  • The Committee set meaningful goals to motivate NEO performance and create value for our shareholders at the beginning of 2024, which were primarily concentrated in the Firm’s three strategic priorities.
  • Balanced against the challenging macro environment, the Committee believes that our NEOs executed well, provided solid operational control through disciplined cost management, made tremendous advancements in our strategic priorities, and maintained a strong balance sheet and liquidity position while returning capital to our shareholders via share repurchases and dividends.
  • •Experienced a year-over-year decline in revenue of approximately 8% (9% per billing day) and adjusted diluted EPS of approximately 23% as a result of the challenging macro environment.
  • •Achieved best-in-class revenue performance within our Technology business compared to our most direct peers indicating that we continued to grow our market share.
  • •Achieved a 9th place ranking among our 2024 Peer Group though our total shareholder return (TSR) over the past three years (January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024) outperformed nearly all of our most direct peers.
  • •Meaningfully advanced the implementation of our future enterprise cloud application, Workday, including (a) the streamlining of our overall implementation timeline and deployment for our human capital management (“HCM”) and financials modules; (b) successfully completed the preliminary design phase for both HCM and financials; (c) accomplished the first phase of unit testing for HCM and began the prototype build for our initial tenant; (d) deployed a new, scalable platform for the management of our incentive compensation plans and (e) prepared ourselves for the subsequent phases of this program.
  • •Significantly progressed the integration of our consulting-oriented business within the Firm.
  • Our integrated strategy efforts continue to capitalize on the strong relationships we have with world-class companies by utilizing our existing sales teams, recruiters, consulting solutions professionals, technology practice experts, among other teams within the Firm, to provide higher value engagements that effectively and cost efficiently address our clients’ challenges.
  • During 2024, we (a) refreshed our sales methodologies, pursuit strategy and strategic account management approach with 100% of the leaders across the Firm being certified in the program, (b) centralized certain teams within the Firm to provide even greater focus, (c) clarified roles and responsibilities and (d) better aligned certain incentive plans to the desired outcomes.
  • •Made the strategic decision to establish a development center in Pune, India following a period of comprehensive due diligence, including an executive trip in August 2024 to India.
  • This India development center began supporting project engagements with our U.S.-based clients in January 2025.
  • We believe this development center, when combined with a strong U.S. sales and delivery capability and a high-quality vendor network, will help us to more fully address the evolving needs of our clients, whether onshore, nearshore or offshore.
  • We also earned several awards, including: Times’ America’s Best Mid-Size Companies, Fortune’s Best Workplaces for Women, Top 5 Workplaces in Tampa Bay, Great Place to Work and secured a position on Newsweek’s Excellence 1000 Index because of our outstanding achievement in employee and customer satisfaction.
  • •No incentive payouts for the Revenue and EPS components of our 2024 annual incentives as actual results for both fell below threshold performance levels due, in part, to the rigor in which we establish our objectives.
  • •Equity LTI payouts slightly below target payout levels based on the 9th place ranking for TSR performance relative to our 2024 Peer Group.
  • Set Challenging Performance ObjectivesWe work to set difficult but attainable financial growth performance objectives for our NEOs in the context of the annual incentive plan as evidenced by the fact that threshold and target goals and objectives have not been met in every plan year (as was the case in 2023 and 2024).
  • The performance objectives are structured to incentivize our NEOs to outpace market growth expectations thereby gaining market share, and improving profitability levels.
  • In addition, threshold levels of performance for our financial measures (most namely the revenue component) always require growth over the previous year even in adverse economic environments where revenues may reasonably be expected to decline.
  • This further strengthens the structure and pay for performance orientation of our NEO compensation plans.
  • Our Clawback Policy was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
  • The Committee makes every effort to maintain its independence and objectivity.
  • The Committee meets in executive session on a quarterly basis for discussions or decisions regarding executive compensation.
  • While the Committee receives input and discusses compensation with its CEO, COO and CFO, the ultimate determination regarding the annual compensation of the CEO, and the other NEOs, is in the Committee’s sole and absolute discretion.
  • The Committee has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees, as it deems appropriate.
  • •as appropriate, engaging along with Kforce’s executive management team, in dialogue with the Firm’s shareholders to understand their views and feedback; and
  • The Committee assessed Pay Governance’s independence based on various factors and determined Pay Governance’s engagement, and the anticipated services to be provided to the Committee, did not raise any conflicts of interest.
  • Overall, our independent compensation consultant assists with various items, including: evaluating and providing guidance with respect to compliance with the approved compensation framework and its alignment with our performance; effectiveness of the compensation framework; benchmarking studies and analysis; and competitiveness of our executive compensation (including salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives) as compared to the market.
  • The Committee uses a peer group of companies as a source for executive compensation benchmarking data and comparisons to Kforce’s executive compensation levels; insight into external compensation practices; and assistance with determining specific financial objectives for our performance-based compensation.
  • Additionally, in 2024, our peer group was used to assess performance in determining annual equity LTI compensation levels based on our 3-year TSR performance in comparison to peers.
  • The primary criteria for selection include customers, revenue footprint, geographical and domestic presence, talent, complexity of operating model and direct competitors.
  • Consistent with the recommendation of Pay Governance, the Committee approved the removal of Perficient Inc. from our peer group going forward following its acquisition in October 2024.
  • The following table shows the financial statistics for the year ended December 31, 2023 and includes our percentile rank among the 2024 Peer Group:
  • (in thousands)Revenue Market Capitalization25th Percentile$1,055 $691 Median$1,591 $1,898 75th Percentile$3,647 $3,118 Kforce Inc.$1,532 $1,319 Percentile Rank4343
  • As a result of our annual outreach efforts that we initiated in 2024, we engaged with several of our top 25 shareholders.
  • The Committee considered the results of the most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation and determined that, given the significant level of support, no material changes to our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices were necessary for our 2024 compensation program.
  • Our performance continued to be adversely affected by the ongoing macro uncertainties, which resulted in our clients being more cautious with the level of investment in their digital transformation efforts.
  • With that said, our Technology business was largely stable throughout 2024 as indicated by our sequential billing day growth in both the second and fourth quarters of 2024 with a slight sequential decline in the third quarter.
  • Against the backdrop of revenue declines, we continued to manage down our overall headcount levels, especially in our delivery roles, and tightly control spend levels in order to mitigate the pressure on profitability from the lower revenue and gross margin levels.
  • The political landscape in the U.S. remains unclear, particularly with respect to the impacts of the potential policy changes from the new administration.
  • Geopolitical risks persist, including uncertainty in the Middle East and global supply chain disruptions.
  • Despite these challenges, the U.S. economy demonstrated consistent growth in 2024, with real GDP expanding at 2.8%, largely driven by increased government spending and a healthy consumer.
  • Although the unemployment rate rose to 4.1% in December 2024 from 3.7% in December 2023, employment grew across most sectors in the final quarter of 2024.
  • Additionally, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a total of 100 basis points in late 2024, but the prospects for further interest rate cuts in 2025 appear less certain with inflation being a bit stickier and the labor markets continuing to show signs of strength.
  • During 2024, the Firm did not have any adjusted financial performance measures, and as a result, Adjusted Diluted EPS was equal to GAAP, as reported.
  • A part of our compensation philosophies is that we do not compensate our NEOs when we experience revenue declines; thus, our financial performance in 2024 did not meet the required threshold of revenue, despite strong performance relative to our peers.
  • In addition, given the impact of the year-over-year revenue decline on our profitability levels, adjusted diluted EPS also did not meet threshold levels.
  • Thus, no incentive payout was earned or paid for either measure.
  • We remain excited about our strategic position and prospects for continuing to deliver above-market results over the long-term while continuing to make the necessary investments to help drive long-term growth and enable us to generate greater operating margins when we return to $1.7 billion in annual revenue and achieve our longer-term goal of double digit operating margins at slightly greater than $2 billion in annual revenues.
  • Our three-year TSR performance (the metric upon which equity LTI payouts are based) resulted in a 9th place finish among our 2024 Peer Group.
  • The following graph presents our three-year TSR performance amongst our 2024 Peer Group.
  • •No attainment of the revenue and adjusted diluted EPS components of annual incentives for 2024 given the rigor in which objectives are established and near maximum attainment of individual MBOs.
  • •Grant of LTIs based on achieving 9th place for three-year TSR performance relative to our 2024 Peer Group.
  • Although NEO salaries for 2024 remained below the market median, the Committee and the NEOs decided not to increase salaries given the challenging macro environment.
  • Liberatore$875,000 $875,000 — %David M.
  • Kelly$540,000 $540,000 — %Jeffrey B.
  • Hackman$400,000 $400,000 — %Andrew G.
  • Thomas$400,000 $400,000 — %
  • The MBO Incentive represented 20% of the total target incentive award.
  • 2024 Annual Incentive2024 Target Annual Incentive AllocationName2024 Salary%$Revenue(40%)EPS(40%)MBO(20%)Joseph J.
  • Liberatore$875,000 125 %$1,093,750 $437,500 $437,500 $218,750 David M.
  • Kelly (1)$540,000 100 %$540,000 $216,000 $216,000 $108,000 Jeffrey B.
  • Hackman$400,000 90 %$360,000 $144,000 $144,000 $72,000 Andrew G.
  • Thomas$400,000 90 %$360,000 $144,000 $144,000 $72,000
  • (1) As previously disclosed, the Committee approved an increase in Mr. Kelly’s target annual incentive to 100% of salary to align to the market median.
  • Maximum growth levels are two times target market-based growth.
  • Despite the uncertainty in the macro environment that existed when the above performance levels were established, and the expectation that we could experience a year-over-year revenue decline in 2024 (and consequently a potential decline in EPS), threshold levels were established at 0% based on our historical philosophy of only compensating our NEOs for revenue growth irrespective of adverse economic climates.
  • For 2024, the Committee continued to take a market-based approach using Staffing Industry Analyst (SIA) and analyst consensus expectations of growth.
  • For 2024, we achieved revenue of $1.41 billion and adjusted diluted EPS of $2.68, which did not meet the threshold level within 2024 financial metrics, resulting in no payout for revenue and adjusted diluted EPS.
  • The 2024 MBO Incentive for the NEOs, as described previously, was focused on our strategic objectives to (a) make significant progress on our multi-year back-office transformation program, including the implementation of Workday as our future state cloud-based HCM and financials system, (b) further integrate our solutions offering within the Firm, (c) evolve our nearshore and offshore delivery capability, which ultimately led to the establishment of a development center in Pune, India that will service our U.S. based clients and (d) deliver solid revenue performance relative to our closest peers.
  • The 2024 MBO Incentive also included various individual objectives in addition to our strategic objectives.
  • In 2024, as described earlier in the CD&A, our NEOs made significant progress on these strategic initiatives (each of which is transformational in nature) while continuing to deliver solid relative financial performance and making the necessary adjustments in the business to mitigate the pressure that lower revenue and gross profit levels had on profitability levels.
  • Liberatore$1,093,750 —%—%180%$— $— $393,750 $393,750 David M.
  • Kelly$540,000 —%—%180%$— $— $194,400 $194,400 Jeffrey B.
  • Hackman$360,000 —%—%180%$— $— $129,600 $129,600 Andrew G.
  • Thomas$360,000 —%—%180%$— $— $129,600 $129,600
  • Peer Group Relative TSR Rank:1381NameThresholdTargetMaxJoseph J.
  • Liberatore$1,500,000 $3,000,000 $4,250,000 David M.
  • Kelly$750,000 $1,320,000 $1,900,000 Jeffrey B.
  • Hackman$500,000 $900,000 $1,500,000 Andrew G.
  • Thomas$400,000 $700,000 $1,000,000

More changes truncated for legibility. Open the filings on SEC for full prose.

Cells reading “Not extracted” mean the deterministic extractor didn’t pick up that disclosure for the listed filing — not that it isn’t in the proxy. Open the company workspace and use Ask to query the CD&A directly.