ProxyMiner / Diff

ALBEMARLE CORP ALB

Comparing the 2025 proxy against the 2026 proxy.

← Back to ALBEMARLE CORP

Compare

CEO total Δ

+$1,145,156

+8.0% year-over-year

Peer churn

0

Members added or dropped across all peer groups

Policy + metric churn

4

Disclosures whose value moved or appeared/disappeared

Peer groups

Peer disclosure

  • 2025 Peer Group

    — · 14 → 14 members

    14 kept · +0 · −0

    Same membership year-over-year.

Executive pay

Named executive compensation

ExecutiveStatusFromToΔ TotalΔ %Δ At-risk
J. Kent Masters, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ChangedCEO$14,368,498

2024

$15,513,654

2025

+$1,145,156+8.0%+0.7 pp
Netha N. Johnson, Jr.Former Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
Changed$3,315,087

2024

$5,312,779

2025

+$1,997,692+60.3%-28.6 pp
Melissa H. AndersonExecutive Vice President, Chief Business Transformation Officer
Changed$2,440,430

2024

$3,228,404

2025

+$787,974+32.3%+6.2 pp
Eric W. NorrisExecutive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer
Changed$3,434,139

2024

$4,212,206

2025

+$778,067+22.7%+3.5 pp
Neal R. SheoreyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Changed$3,463,336

2024

$4,125,939

2025

+$662,603+19.1%+7.0 pp
Kristin M. ColemanFormer Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Removed$4,746,800

2024

————
Mark R. MummertExecutive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
Added—$2,477,454

2025

———

Governance

Policy guardrails

  • change in control

    Unchanged

    Not extracted → Not extracted

    “Masters and the Company (the “Original Change in Control Agreement”)”

  • clawback

    Unchanged

    present → present

    “clawback policy that covers both time and performance-based awards made under our incentive plansMaintain Strong Governance Practices”

  • compensation committee

    Unchanged

    Compensation & Talent Development Committee → Compensation & Talent Development Committee

    “Executive Compensation & Talent Development Committee”

  • compensation consultant

    Unchanged

    independent → independent

    “Independent Compensation Consultant”

  • hedging

    Unchanged

    Not extracted → Not extracted

    “No hedging, pledging, or short selling of Company stock”

  • pledging

    Unchanged

    prohibited → prohibited

    “Our insider trading policy prohibits, among other things, Directors, officers, and employees of the Company from engaging in short sales, put options or call options; purchasing on margin or holding in margin accounts; p…”

  • stock ownership guidelines

    Unchanged

    present → present

    “Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines”

Performance markers

Metric facts

  • ceo pay ratio

    Changed

    212 to 1 → 216 to 1

    Numeric delta: +4.00

    “total compensation was $71,667 for the year ended December 31, 2025 (calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K). On the same basis, the total annualized compensation for our CEO for the year ended…”

  • median employee compensation

    Changed

    $67,663 → $71,667

    Numeric delta: +4004.00

    “paid this median base cash compensation amount. For each of these employees, we determined total compensation paid for the year-ended December 31, 2025 (calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K) …”

  • relative tsr

    Added

    Not extracted → 100th percentile

    “Masters' contract as a CEO was established at the beginning of 2023 at the end of a period in which absolute TSR for the prior year was above 200%, while relative TSR for the same period was at the top of the peer group …”

  • revenue

    Changed

    $8 billion → $1 million

    Numeric delta: -7999000000.00

    “Executive officers must either obtain pre-clearance to trade from our General Counsel or a designee thereof, or trade in accordance with a preexisting Rule 10b5-1 trading plan that meets applicable SEC requirements. Equi…”

  • time equity mix

    Unchanged

    25% → 25%

    Numeric delta: 0.00

    “Albemarle's 2025 LTIP for its NEOs was comprised of 50% target PSUs, 25% time-based RSUs and 25% stock options.”

Narrative

CD&A prose similarity

Coarse measure of how much the compensation discussion text moved year-over-year. Not a substitute for reading the actual filings.

19% shingled-prose overlap between the two filings.

2025: 75,955 chars · 2026: 89,323 chars

  • Pay Ratio (Item 402(u)):16% overlap (52,984 → 60,000 chars)
  • Say-on-Pay proposal:0% overlap (25,000 → 25,000 chars)

Narrative

What actually changed in the CD&A

Sentence-level diff between the two filings. New disclosures appear first, then sentences whose wording shifted, then sentences the prior year had that are no longer present.

272 new127 changed313 removed121 unchanged
  • changedIn this section, we describe the material components of the 2025 2024compensation program for the named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below, (“NEOs”),whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement.
  • newDear Fellow Shareholders,
  • newIn 2025, Albemarle maintained its disciplined execution and portfolio management priorities to stay competitive and agile while delivering for our shareholders.
  • newAmid a challenging end‑market and operating environment, particularly in the global lithium industry, over the past two years the leadership team took decisive action to preserve Albemarle’s industry‑leading position despite significant market volatility.
  • newThanks to these focused, disciplined cost and cash‑management and operational measures, we are pleased to have delivered strong operating and free cash flow for 2025, supported by our streamlined organizational structure.
  • newWe are strengthened by our financial discipline, culture of continuous improvement and resilience, geographically diverse assets and global footprint, as well as the recent closing of the sale of our controlling stake in Ketjen Corporation and sale of our interest in the Eurecat joint venture.
  • newWe believe we are well-positioned to continue our focus on our core businesses – Energy Storage and Specialties – and to maintain our commitment to cost discipline and to delivering shareholder returns.
  • newIn line with these results, the 2025 annual incentive plan paid out at 151.5% of target, reflecting our strong adjusted EBITDA and Operating Cash Flow Conversion Rate performance for the year.
  • newThe 2023-2025 long-term incentive plan paid out at 90.1% of target for Relative Total Shareholder Return ("rTSR") PSUs and 0% for adjusted Return on Invested Capital ("adjusted ROIC") PSUs, which the Committee views as appropriate to ensure strong accountability and alignment with our shareholder experience.
  • newThe Board and Committee regularly solicit key shareholder feedback to inform the ongoing evolution of our compensation and governance practices.
  • newPrior to and following the 2025 Say-on-Pay vote, which received support below the prior year, the Committee initiated an expanded shareholder engagement outreach effort to better understand investor priorities and preferences regarding our executive compensation program.
  • newIn response to feedback received, the Committee has implemented several changes to the fiscal 2026 compensation program design and enhanced this year’s proxy disclosure as follows:
  • newFiscal 2026 Compensation Program Changes:
  • new•Updated Albemarle’s compensation peer group for fiscal 2026 compensation decisions to more closely align with our operating size;
  • new•Rebalanced equity mix to 60% target PSUs / 40% RSUs, instead of 50% target PSUs / 25% RSUs / 25% Stock Options, to increase the portion of pay directly linked to pre-set performance targets;
  • new•Raised the relative TSR target performance level from the median to the 55th percentile of the performance peer group to strengthen the PSU plan rigor; and
  • new•Removed the individual component in the annual incentive plan for executive officers to drive greater team alignment around Company goals and improve payout transparency.
  • newCompensation Disclosure Enhancements:
  • new•Disclosed forward-looking goals for 2025 PSUs to enhance transparency around the rigor of our long-term performance hurdles; and
  • new•Enhanced disclosure of individual performance considerations that informed the 2025 annual incentive plan payouts.
  • newFor additional details on the Committee’s engagement effort and responsiveness actions, please see the ‘Shareholder Engagement’ section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section that follows.
  • newCritical to our ability to continue executing our cost-optimizing growth strategy are the continued commitment and contributions of our highly-qualified leadership team, who are equipped with the right expertise to guide Albemarle through industry cycles and broader macroeconomic shifts.
  • newThe Committee continuously seeks to balance our business priorities while ensuring our compensation program remains competitive, performance-based and shareholder-aligned, regardless of the positive benefits or negative impacts of the larger pricing environment.
  • newOn behalf of the Committee, we appreciate your continued engagement as we work to enhance our executive compensation program to align with shareholder interests and Albemarle’s long-term growth strategy.
  • newWe respectfully request your vote in support of the 2025 advisory resolution to approve named executive officer compensation.Executive Compensation & Talent Development CommitteeDiarmuid B.
  • newO'Connell, ChairHolly A.
  • newVan DeursenAlejandro D.
  • newWolffMark R.
  • newWidmar
  • changed2025 2024NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
  • changedFor the purposes of this CD&A, the Summary Compensation Table and other tables set forth in this Proxy Statement, our NEOs for the 2025 2024fiscal year are: were:
  • newAndersonExecutive Vice President, Chief Business Transformation OfficerMark R.
  • changedMummertExecutive Johnson,Jr.ExecutiveVice President, Chief Operations OfficerEric W.
  • changedNorrisExecutive Vice President, Chief Commercial OfficerNetha N. OfficerKristinM.
  • newJohnson, Jr.Former Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
  • newNote: Mr. Johnson separated from Albemarle effective August 10, 2025.
  • newCD&A HIGHLIGHTS
  • newCompany Overview2025 Financial and Operational Performance2025 Compensation Program HighlightsMarket Alignment, Risk Profile and Incentive Plan DesignShareholder Engagement2025 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder EngagementExecutive Compensation FrameworkCompensation Philosophy and Principles and Pay for Performance AlignmentExecutive Compensation ManagementRoles in Determining Executive Compensation, How We Use Market Data and the Compensation Risk Assessment2025 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes2025 Base Salaries, Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan Decisions and OutcomesOther Compensation and Personal BenefitsOther Compensation Policies and Guidelines
  • newCOMPANY OVERVIEW
  • newAlbemarle is an innovative and competitive company powered by world-class resources and the expertise to win in attractive markets.
  • changedWe are Albemarleisa world leader in transforming essential resources into critical ingredients for mobility, energy, connectivity, connectivityand health.
  • newWith a driving purpose to enable a more resilient world, we strategically partner with companies, governments, and communities to pioneer new ways to move, power, connect, and protect.
  • changedThe end markets we serve include grid storage, automotive, defense, aerospace, conventional energy, electronics, construction, agriculture and food, pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticalsand medical devices.
  • changedWe believe that Albemarle's world-class resources with reliable and consistent supply, its leading process chemistry, high-impact innovation, customer centricity, centricityand focus on people and planet will enable us itto maintain a leading position in the industries in which we operate. itoperates.
  • changedAs of December 31, 2025, 2024,Albemarle served approximately 1,900 customers in roughly approximately70 countries.
  • newFISCAL 2025 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
  • newLithium Pricing Market Environment
  • newAs one of the largest lithium producers, Albemarle’s stock price is highly correlated with lithium prices and has been disproportionately affected by the sharp two-year decline, compared to the broader specialty chemicals sector.
  • newThe chart below illustrates the correlation between Albemarle’s share price and the Lithium Carbonate Price through the last three-year down cycle and the market improvement in late 2025.
  • new*Lithium Carbonate China DEL Spot Index Price; Source: Shanghai Metals Market (SMM)
  • newLithium is becoming a more mature industry, with pricing being more strongly influenced by market and geopolitical dynamics.
  • newOur incentive programs are designed to incentivize management based on what they can control, while mitigating some of the impact of fluctuations in market lithium prices on their incentive plans.
  • newThe Committee strives to align payouts and pay program design with actual management contributions and performance, regardless of outsized positive or negative end market pricing environment impacts.
  • newThroughout 2025, the management team took decisive action to implement cost and productivity improvements across the business, while focusing on maintaining competitiveness through variable market pricing cycles.
  • newAs a result of these focused initiatives and disciplined cash management, the Company was well positioned to capitalize on its lower cost structure, both as lithium prices remained depressed and as lithium markets began to recover in late 2025.
  • newTo achieve this, we prioritized several key initiatives, including:
  • new•Reducing costs and improving our operations efficiency;
  • new•Reducing capital expenditures, including smarter approaches in sustaining capital without compromising safety or productivity;
  • new•Focusing on operating cash flow conversion and free cash flow improvements;
  • new•Optimizing our operations with our joint venture partners, especially in our conversion network; and
  • new•Enhancing our overall financial flexibility.
  • newWe encourage shareholders to review management’s actions (see page 1 of this Proxy Statement) for additional details about our operational initiatives and programs implemented to help mitigate the impact of pricing pressures.
  • new2025 Financial and Operational Performance Results4
  • newStrong operational execution in 2025 delivered net sales of $5.1B with sales volume up 12% and gains in all segments.
  • newAdjusted EBITDA of $1.1B exceeded plan, supported by cost reductions and productivity improvements.
  • newWe delivered significant operating cash flow of $1.3B, supported by working capital reductions and a customer prepayment.
  • newThe high operating cash flow combined with lower capital spending levels delivered $692M of free cash flow.
  • new4 Please refer to the reconciliation of non‑GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures as presented in Exhibit C of this document.
  • newThese reconciliations, which appear in the section titled ‘Reconciliation of Non‑GAAP Financial Measures,’ should be reviewed when considering the financial information summarized in this Proxy Statement.
  • new2025 COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
  • newMarket-Aligned, Predominantly At-Risk Target Compensation Opportunities
  • newThe Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, sets target pay within the competitive market ranges based on peer group benchmarks and market surveys.
  • newConsistent with our compensation principles, NEOs are primarily rewarded through performance-based cash and equity incentives that align pay with strategic priorities and shareholder interests.
  • changedAs shown in the chart below, in 2025, at-risk, variable compensation represented basedonCompanyandindividualperformancewasapproximately 90% of 2024target pay opportunities for the CEO and an average of 80% for 79%of2024targetpayoftheother current NEOs (Messrs.
  • newSheorey, Norris, and Mummert and Ms. Anderson).
  • newTarget pay for our executives encompasses annual base salary, target cash bonus opportunity, stock closing price at the grant date for RSUs and target PSUs, and the Black-Scholes value for Stock Options at the grant date.
  • newTarget pay represents the pay decisions made by the Committee in February 2025 for each of the NEOs.
  • newIncentive Plan Payouts Aligned with Performance
  • newConsistent with our strong financial and operational performance results, the incentive plan payouts were aligned with shareholder experience over the corresponding performance periods.
  • new2025 Annual Bonus PlanPerformance under our 2025 Annual Incentive Plan included achievement of adjusted EBITDA at 115% of the target performance goal and Operating Cash Flow Conversion Rate at 113% of the target performance goal.

Removed from 2025

  • Dear Shareholder,
  • Albemarle’s executive compensation program is designed to achieve strong alignment between the Company’s long-term goals and its shareholders’ interests, while providing a competitive total pay opportunity to attract and retain the key executives who drive the business and develop the next generation of leaders.
  • We are committed to continually reviewing Albemarle’s executive compensation program to ensure it is grounded in our pay-for-performance philosophy.
  • As a Committee, we review Albemarle’s executive program on an annual basis, taking into consideration investor feedback, business performance and the Company’s strategic roadmap.
  • We have received solid historical Say-on-Pay support from shareholders and maintain a robust shareholder engagement process, with an annual shareholder outreach to obtain and incorporate their feedback into our executive compensation program.
  • In 2024, Albemarle faced global market volatility which negatively impacted lithium prices and its financial results.
  • To ensure continued alignment between pay and performance, the Committee reviewed the compensation and performance peer group.
  • The peer group is used as a reference point for determining executive compensation (level and mix) and as a reference point for determining relative total shareholder return.
  • The Committee also reviewed the alignment between realizable pay and total shareholder return (see illustration on page 33 of this Proxy Statement) and concluded that a strong relation exists.
  • The Committee exercised negative discretion for the 2024 annual incentive payout.
  • The Committee also made changes to its short- and long-term incentive metrics to align with its short- and long-term goals, all of which are discussed below in “Committee Actions.”
  • The Committee considered whether to eliminate or adjust the modifier around lithium prices and its impact on adjusted EBITDA results.
  • The Committee decided not to remove the modifier while prices were at historical lows as removal could correspond with a period of increasing prices that could over reward management for market factors outside of their control.
  • Instead, the Committee elected to widen threshold and superior ranges to further reduce the disproportionate impact that lithium pricing volatility has on compensation tied to the Company's financial performance.
  • We will continue to monitor market conditions to ensure our compensation program remains aligned with the Company's goals and its shareholders' interests.
  • We appreciate your support and welcome your feedback on the executive compensation program as discussed in the following pages.
  • Executive Compensation & Talent Development CommitteeAlejandro D.
  • Wolff, ChairDean L.
  • SeaversDiarmuid B.
  • O'ConnellHolly A.
  • Van Deursen
  • 30
  • AndersonExecutive Vice President, Chief People and Transformation OfficerNetha N.
  • ColemanFormer Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
  • Notes: Prior to November 1, 2024, Mr. Johnson’s role was President, Specialties.
  • Prior to November 1, 2024, Mr. Norris' role was President, Energy Storage.
  • Ms. Coleman separated from Albemarle effective November 4, 2024.
  • 2024 Compensation Highlights
  • Advisory Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote
  • Albemarle’s pay philosophy reflects a strong focus on corporate governance.
  • Two pillars of our pay philosophy are aligning pay with performance and aligning pay to shareholder interests.
  • This corporate governance ethos is strongly supported by the Company's shareholders as reflected in their historical Say-on-Pay voting results.
  • 2024 SOP support was below historical norms.
  • We believe that the lower share price, as a result of the lower lithium price, contributed to that lower SOP support.
  • We actively seek out and value the input and insights of the Company's shareholders.
  • This feedback has resulted in changes in Albemarle's compensation program, as illustrated below.
  • 2021–Raised threshold performance for rTSR from the 25th percentile to the 30th percentile–Lowered the payout at threshold performance from 50% to 30%2019–Introduced Return on Invested Capital as a second metric for the LTI plan to ensure alignment between the expected return on capital and LTI payout opportunities (as the Company entered a period of higher investments) –Put cap of 100% on relative TSR payouts if TSR is negative2017–Included a “double trigger” in our equity plan and award agreements, so that in the event of a Change in Control, equity would only vest following a termination of employment
  • 31
  • Shareholder Engagement
  • We are committed to meaningful engagement with investors.
  • In 2024, we continued our practice of annual engagement with shareholders on issues that are important to them.
  • These discussions provide us with a basis upon which to continually evaluate our executive compensation and corporate governance practices.
  • This engagement included Board members, including the Chair of the Committee, and a group of senior leaders of the Company.
  • The chart illustrates our shareholder outreach for the 2022-2024 period.
  • Our 2024 outreach included inviting all shareholders identified as having voted against the latest SOP proposal to engage on and understand any concerns.
  • We received positive feedback from our investors with which we engaged, indicating understanding of and support for the general structure and implementation of our executive compensation program.
  • Each stressed the importance of strong alignment between realizable pay and performance.
  • These shareholders acknowledge the transparency offered in past proxy statements and have indicated their desire for providing additional insight on Committee discussions to enhance understanding of the governance level and the deliberation processes of the Committee.
  • With that in mind, we are including some of the most critical topics discussed by the Committee in the next section.
  • Committee Actions in Aligning Pay and Performance
  • The Committee annually assesses the efficacy of the Company’s executive compensation and benefit programs.
  • It also considers changing market conditions that could impact the effectiveness of our programs in the future, such as the composition of our compensation and performance peer groups and the metrics to be included in our short- and long-term incentive programs.
  • The Committee reviews the compensation peer group, which is based on a mix of quantitative and qualitative criteria (see page 42 of this Proxy Statement) on an annual basis.
  • Early in 2024 the Committee settled on using the same peer group for 2025 as for 2024.
  • Due to the change in lithium price and its impact on Company revenue, the Committee revisited the peer group later in 2024.
  • With volumes up, but revenue down, the Committee adjusted benchmarking results from $12 billion to $8 billion in market capitalization to reflect Albemarle's relative size to peers.
  • This adjusted benchmark was used as a reference point in managing 2025 compensation levels for executive officers.
  • It has been particularly challenging for the Committee to identify a set of appropriate peers that could be considered a true comparator of how well Albemarle’s management is driving both long and short-term performance.
  • This is largely due to 64% of Albemarle’s revenue coming from its lithium based business, the limited number of U.S. owned and publicly traded companies that both mine and process
  • 32
  • lithium and unique attributes of the end markets driving the demand for the energy storage products.
  • With support of its compensation consultant, the Committee explored several alternatives ranging from Lithium ETFs to the S&P 500 and S&P 400 as well as sub sections of each.
  • For each alternative the Committee reviewed its total shareholder return as well as its correlation with Albemarle's total shareholder return.
  • Those alternatives that best fit Albemarle would have paid out at similar levels on average for grants issued between 2016 and 2022.
  • Consequently, the Committee decided to continue with the same peer group for compensation and performance, as no clear rationale for a better peer group emerged and none of the alternatives explored had a material impact on the outcomes.
  • The Committee continues to set target pay (before performance results are considered) within the competitive market range against the Company's peer group as well as general market surveys.
  • The Committee strives to use short- and long-term metrics and target performance levels such that realizable pay strongly correlates with Albemarle's actual performance as captured by its total shareholder return.
  • The chart below demonstrates that such a strong correlation exists for the 2020-2024 period.
  • The chart also illustrates realizable pay being well below target pay for the 2021-2024 period, with realizable pay for 2023 and 2024 at 30% and 39% of target TDC respectively.
  • 2023 realizable pay is below that of 2024, mainly driven by a 65% drop in stock price from the original 2023 grant value while 2024 realizable pay reflects a smaller drop (27%) in stock price from the original 2024 grant value.
  • Target pay for 2024 is slightly above that of 2023, as it reflects the first full year of target pay under the 2023 CEO contract.
  • When Albemarle’s former CEO unexpectedly retired in 2020 due to a health issue, Mr. Masters was asked to transition from a Board member to a transitionary CEO and Board member.
  • His 2020 and 2021 pay reflected his expected short-term transitionary role.
  • Mr. Masters was then asked to become the long-term CEO and his pay was set at a competitive CEO target pay level given his skills, being an experienced CEO and his strong record of realizing Company growth.
  • With the drop in the Company's financial result and TSR due to declining lithium prices, Mr. Masters’ realizable pay dropped commensurately:
  • •Mr. Masters was not given an increase in target pay in 2024
  • •The Board exercised negative discretion on his 2023 annual incentive payout
  • •Albemarle’s stock price decline is reflected in his vested and unvested LTI values
  • For the 2024 annual incentive plan payout, the Committee decided to exercise negative discretion, lowering the overall payout by 34 percentage points (from 141.5% to 107.5%) for employees participating in the Enterprise annual incentive plan.
  • This negative discretion was exercised to align payouts with the underlying business performance by adjusting for costs that were capitalized according to standard accounting practices.

More changes truncated for legibility. Open the filings on SEC for full prose.

Cells reading “Not extracted” mean the deterministic extractor didn’t pick up that disclosure for the listed filing — not that it isn’t in the proxy. Open the company workspace and use Ask to query the CD&A directly.